Some have claimed that US wars are fought to profit US Business interests. I would argue that, while not completely inaccurate, this is an oversimplification that is fundamentally at odds with the broader picture of US policy.
As I wrote to a friend on the subject:
I think you're conflating a couple of largely separate issues
when you talk about serving US business's profit motive and executive
security powers; while it's true that
the areas can overlap (it's at least arguable that politicians'
connections to the energy industry [Cheney, but not just him]
encouraged, but did not determine, the Iraq war {though, afterward, it's
a Sovereign though not democratic Iraq that controls the energy
resources, not us, and they contract with whoever they want}. There's
also telecom retroactive immunity, I suppose), I'd say that private
business's (partial) control of regulation and government policy is
75-95% a separate concern from the modern expansion of executive power
used for defense and policing purposes. The extent to which the former
premised situation is a reality is also not completely clear (business
appears to be only one, non-monolithic, influence among many on
government policy, though there's a common belief which I endorse, that
the scales have tipped too far in favor of the power of that broad and
diverse faction (industry, i.e. the US Chamber of Commerce, Business
Roundtable, the financial industry lobbyists, etc).
Ryan,
I guess I'm disturbed by your comment that seems to acknowledge the
institutional difficulties and limitations constricting the presidency.
Would it not, then, be better to help re-elect a cautious reformist like
Obama who, granted, has large weaknesses and is not oppositional enough
to some of the nastier powers out there and has failed on some measures
of leadership, than to allow the selection of an opponent who's both
ideologically and fund-raising-wise and primary-voter-wise in the
pockets of the powers that you loath (on both of the issues above:
economics and security policy)?
No comments:
Post a Comment